—Barrington Williams, B1Daily

Congress has voted to release the Epstein files, following nearly a decade of stalling between both parties and two different presidential administrations.

Critics note that the US federal authorities are most likely going to release the redacted version of the Epstein files, which would shield associates of Epstein from further criminal prosecution.

A angle not being considered are the dozens of federal statues that allow for the continued classification of Epstein’s dossier composed by the FBI.

The FBI has already publicly admitted that it composed extensive dossiers on Epstein and his dealings for national security purposes.

The FBI’s purview of national security encompasses public disclosures as well sealing of internal memos or documents. Meaning that there is a strong chance that the FBI has more information on Epstein that the public will never get to see because it would hamper America’s hegemony or threaten its national security.

We know that 7 different victims of Epstein claimed that when they gave their list of Epstein’s associates to the federal authorities, they were all turned away.

We know that former US labor secretary Jim Acosta who was slated to prosecute Epstein in the early 2000’s was told to back off by the FBI because he was considered a “asset” to the agency.

The FBI has admitted under congressional oath, that it often utilizes espionage and blackmail tactics as methods of coercion.

There is a strong chance that the FBI has more information on Epstein that the public will never get to see because it would threaten its national security.

And most importantly, current FBI head Kash Patel, who ran on forcing the agency to release every piece info it had on Epstein, went silent on the issue for over 6 months following his nomination as head of the agency.

Michael Hayden, a former CIA director notes in his book ‘The Assault on Intelligence: American Nation Security in the Age of Lies‘, directors of intelligence agencies are sworn to secrecy concerning current and past operations.

So Patel refuting the knowledge of any additional Epstein files is completely in line with the longstanding tradition of swearing to secrecy.

Why did federal authorities protect Epstein for the better half of 30 years?

Why were Epstein’s victims threatened by federal prosecutors over the course of four different presidential administrations?

Why have the Israelis, Epstein’s closest confidants, and Mossad been silent throughout all of this?

And lastly, why does every powerful person in government and media seem to have some deep connection to him?

—Barrington Williams, B1Daily